photos from Flickr user Glorious Treats - her daughter's first cupcake
Wow, a serious discussion about cupcakes, by T. Berry Brazelton, M.D., and Joshua Sparrow, M.D., in the Houston Chronicle under the headline, "Denying a cupcake is an arbitrary consequence." (Syndicated from the New York Times)
Recently a grandmother wrote in about a day-care birthday celebration where a mother brought nine cupcakes for 12 children. The reader's 3-year-old grandson got animal crackers instead of a cupcake because, the teacher explained, "he had been acting badly all day because it wasn't his birthday." We wrote, "Withholding food is no way to punish or reward a child, and eating problems later on are a likely result." Now another reader adds an opinion.
Q: I do not equate holding back a cupcake to a child who is disruptive as holding back "food."
This was a treat and if the child was disruptive and warned he would not participate in celebrating the birthday of someone in the class by withholding a cupcake then I feel this was appropriate.
Too many kids are given the prize even when they don't deserve it. This enforces bad behavior because there are no consequences.
Comments
2) I would have put a different punishment than not participating or having a cupcake, like a timeout. small children need a quick NOW consiquence for bad behavior not missing out on what others are doing later.
Using time outs or withholding other things (NOT physical play time) such as TV time or toys, would be more beneficial. With almost 40% of US kids either overweight or obese, we should stress healthy eating, including cupcakes for special events.